If Terraform produced a panic, please provide a link to a GitHub Gist containing the output of the crash.log. role_definition_name = "Storage Blob Data Owner" Ask questions azurerm_monitor_diagnostic_setting - cant be deployed because it already exists - but gets deployed right at this moment I needed to "terraform untaint" at least twice for the deployment to work. crash log for terraform provider issue. Terraform currently provides both a standalone Route resource, and allows for Routes to be defined in-line within the Route Table resource. Whilst it's unfortunate that the Service Team have opted to roll the breaking change out to all regions, before deploying the bug fix - as opposed to rolling back (which means that it could be another 1-2 weeks until older versions of the Azure Provider work) - based on the Acceptance Tests, we believe this should fix this issue for users who can upgrade to the latest version of the Azure Provider. It works for now. Yes, I can also confirm that the issue is back for westeurope in combination with azurerm_mssql_database. Because that would explain a lot. The only thing in my extended_auditing_policy block is storage_account_access_key and storage_endpoint. Terraform Azure Policy & Assignment. I only had the extended auditing policy for the server itself, not the databases. No extended policy is set in the resource block, so it should not be recognized at all. From a technical level this workaround sets the field isAzureMonitorTargetEnabled to true - since this is a workaround, this field is hard-coded rather than user-configurable at this point in time (albeit we can look to expose this in future if required). We look forward to your feedback and want to thank you for being such a … You signed in with another tab or window. Sample code here: I had a call with MS Support, they are engaging the conversation with the API team. This is not allowed using the inline settings. For this tutorial, store three secrets – clientId, clientSecret, and tenantId.You will create these secrets because they will be used by Terraform … By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and Thank you for checking! It has been a while since I’ve done Terraform, and the first thing I needed to figure out was if I needed to update my version of Terraform. The key is optional in the new azurerm_mssql_server_extended_auditing_policy resource. Adding the block for the databases seems to have fixed the issue. @satano How did you please proceed? Deploys 1+ Virtual Machines to your provided VNet. @dlm69 Would you mind sharing what you put in that policy? »Argument Reference The following arguments are supported: repository - (Required) The GitHub repository. My workaround is to remove the azurerm_mssql_database_extended_auditing_policy or azurerm_mssql_server_extended_auditing_policy and replacing with the old (soon to be depracated) extended_auditing_policy block within azurerm_mssql_database or azurerm_mssql_server. The Terraform provider is attempting to run a command to send updates to the source config section as above (not sure why it does, since nothing has changed). I can confirm that I was also still experiencing issues as of two days ago. @marianbendik We have Terraform state stored in container in Azure storage account. # To prevent this, add a lifecycle customisation and specify application_type as an attribute to ignore. Can someone check whether terraform isn't using this endpoint for some unknown reason while creating the 'azurerm_sql_server' resource without 'extended_auditing_policy' specified? to your account. @jason-johnson Doesn't that mean that you went from having no extended auditing policy to actually having one, i.e. terraform-azurerm-vnet. I can provide more details if needed. I can confirm that the change in Azure API was released to West Europe and it works with azurerm provider 2.32.0 , but it was not yet rolled out to East US for example. But when deployment is run again (no update or change) it fails. ", Just deploy a sql server with sql database using the azurerm_mssql provider. It has been a while since I’ve done Terraform, and the first thing I needed to figure out was if I needed to update my version of Terraform. Devs can commit code to a GitHub repo, begin a build and test process and immediately notice any issue that crop up. Version 2.36.0. Please keep this note for the community ---> Community Note. Issue the following command in the shell: This Terraform module deploys a Virtual Network in Azure with a subnet or a set of subnets passed in as input parameters. The issue here is, the A records are created automatically by the API without Terraform knowing that it has done so. To reproduce bug, i encounter a bit strange behavior: When component is created for first time it works. The SQL Server actually gets created, I edited the state file to remove the "status": "tainted", line from the "azurerm_mssql_server" resource. This is where the Azure API issue Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#11271 becomes a problem and forces the inline settings to be passed. Have a question about this project? These MSFT docs outline what is required if the storage account has a firewall enabled. Another pipeline run is OK and our infrastructure is created. Create a new GitHub repo for Terraform configuration files (or use an existing repo if you already have one). - hashicorp/terraform Copy changed content back to file in Azure and save it. provider "azurerm" {version = "=2.0.0" subscription_id = "xxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxx" features {}} Currently, I have to manually provide terraform script with the ID or use az account set --subscription 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 command manually prior to executing terraform scripts. Version 2.35.0. That's all. principal_id = azurerm_mssql_server.sql_server.identity.0.principal_id Support for app function keys from the azurerm_function_app without relying on azurerm_function_app_host_keys data source #9854 opened Dec 14, 2020 by sonic1981 Azure marketplace non image agreements eg apps The long-awaited Terraform updates for WVD Spring Release were posted last week, and I was very excited to try this out in my lab. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: We have the same problem ever since midnight CEST. Terraform enables you to safely and predictably create, change, and improve infrastructure. It doesn't work on WestEurope and azurerm v2.32.0, Error issuing create/update request for SQL Server "xxx-sqlserver" Blob Auditing Policies(Resource Group "xxx"): sql.ExtendedServerBlobAuditingPoliciesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=400 -- Original Error: Code="DataSecurityInvalidUserSuppliedParameter" Message="Invalid parameter 'storageEndpoint'. We've just released v2.33 of the Azure Provider, which includes a workaround for this issue. Value should be a blob storage endpoint (e.g. Terraform will automatically remove the OS Disk by default - this behaviour can be configured using the features setting within the Provider block. I just had the same issue. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. Is this expected? @marianbendik Thanks. Longer-term once the bugfix deployment of the Azure API has been rolled out to all regions, older versions of the Azure Provider should working again - and we'll look to revert this workaround (likely towards the end of the year). azurerm_resource_group.main: Creating... azurerm_storage_account.blob_storage: Creating... azurerm_storage_container.blob_container: … If the inline settings are not passed we get the same error as the original post: Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue. Having spoken with Azure Support, it appears that the fix for this in the Azure API has been rolled out to the West Europe region - as such older versions of the Azure Provider should now be available to use in that region. The AzureRM team has worked hard on these changes and is excited to be able to bring you these new features. But as I wrote, if fails with the same error, but not for SQL server, but for the SQL databases now. Same here, terraform deployments are broken atm. The bug here was first noticed on Terraform’s AzureRM release 0.24.0. Do we know, if we have a possible ETA, targeted for eastus region ? Already on GitHub? Please enable Javascript to use this application privacy statement. Contributor role itself was not enough to set up the code repository for Azure Data Factory using Terraform azurerm. Please note the following potential times when an issue might be in Terraform core: Configuration Language or resource ordering issues; State and State Backend issues; Provisioner issues; Registry issues; Spans resources across multiple providers Sign in So I just edit the state file. Yesterday it worked with azurerm v2.30.0, today not anymore, also not with v2.32.0. This would allow the SQL Server identity to access the storage account. We've raised this issue both via a High Priority support ticket and an ICM Ticket internally within Microsoft but are still waiting for the Service Team to respond here unfortunately - we've also confirmed this is present in multiple regions, so unfortunately this requires the Service Team's attention to fix this. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. Please vote on this issue by adding a reaction to the original issue to help … The AzureRM provider for Terraform boasts a large number of resources, unfortunately, we’ve found that many of these are incomplete or lack basic documentation required to quickly get up and running that it’s older and more actively developed, peer, the AWS provider, benefits from. Just needed to make it twice, because after SQL Server itself was OK, the same error happened again on the databases (azurerm_sql_database). Prerequisites 1.1. @dprateek1991 those errors are unrelated to this issue - those errors are saying either the MSSQL server (via it's Managed Identity) or the Service Principal being used doesn't have permissions to the storage account: Insufficient read or write permissions on storage account 'devsolzonesqlsamunfsinb'. terraform untaint on Azure SQL DB resource did the trick. At which point running terraform init -upgrade should download the latest version of the Azure Provider. 1. Latest Version Version 2.38.0. @jason-johnson Below i share working configuration with the deprecated policy block. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. Terraform ‘AzureRM’ Provider Issues. The AzureRM provider for Terraform boasts a large number of resources, unfortunately, we’ve found that many of these are incomplete or lack basic documentation required to quickly get up and running that it’s older and more actively developed, peer, the AWS provider, benefits from. Value should be a blob storage endpoint. However the interesting thing I noticed is that the REST API endpoint for SQL Server create/update that I believe Terraform is using under the hood, does not have any 'storageEndpoint' property. I'm having same error in westeurope, should this be reopened @tombuildsstuff? Indeed. to your account, mssql_server: breaking change in the azure api. Published 21 days ago. ... azurerm_windows_virtual_machine resource can be found in the ./examples/virtual-machine/windows` directory within the Github Repository. Registry . This guide is intended to help with that process. Then I just repeat the workaround - edit the file again, delete all the "status": "tainted" lines (we have 1 server, but several databases) and save it back. It looks like issue is back. scope = azurerm_storage_account.sql_storage_account.id Editing directly in browser is not very comfort, so I just copy the file content into editor, search for "status": "tainted" and delete that line. but I still get the same error as the bug report. Report an issue Top downloaded azurerm modules Modules are self-contained packages of Terraform configurations that are managed as a group. It can be invoked from the Terraform registry. What's worse, because of the diff, terraform would try to recreate it. privacy statement. If you notice any issues with the approach or have other suggestions, please share your feedback in comments! Automating your build and deployment workflow with GitHub Actions allows you to know how your code interacts with the environment right away. FYI MS deployed the breaking change to the East US DC today. terraform-azurerm-compute. My final educated guess is that azurerm_sql_server resource calls the Azure API in a deprecated way and a breaking change removing the compatibility has been made and released to the West EU datacenter.. AKS additional provisioning with Terraform. By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and GitHub repo. At this time you cannot use a Route Table with in-line Routes in conjunction with any Route resources. Error: issuing create/update request for SQL Server "sqlx1txxlxbdevxx312" Blob Auditing Policies(Resource Group "rgxxxx"): sql.ExtendedServerBlobAuditingPoliciesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=400 -- Original Error: Code="DataSecurityInvalidUserSuppliedParameter" Message="Invalid parameter 'storageEndpoint'. Thanks @ddarwent this helped us. Please vote on this issue by adding a reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue … Could that be making a difference? Published 14 days ago. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails. Sign in It converts the Azure region given in slug format (used by Claranet tfwrapper) to the Azure standard format and a short format used for resource naming. @tombuildsstuff But that's the thing, I do have this permission enabled. What we know: Based on these information it appears to be a problem in Azure API & we've opened an issue with MS Support about this. There is a closed issues on AzureRM Terraform provider on GitHub which seems to be impossible to resolve https://github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/34 To avoid this error only possible way which I have found it to use parameters_body argument. @roshanp85 the last two releases of the Azure Provider have included a fix for this, so you can upgrade and this'll be available in EastUS: https://github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#2330-october-22-2020. Provision Instructions Copy and paste into your Terraform configuration, insert the variables, and run terraform init : an unintended change just to get the deployment working again? Please try this release out and share any bugs or enhancement requests with us via GitHub Issues. This is absolutely not right. That issue could be syntax, a wrong method, or some other bug that they’re unaware of. Published 7 days ago. As we used a resource of the type azurerm_storage_account, Terraform knows that it needs the Azure provider. @jason-johnson - I am using the same as @marianbendik - However I have also tested it with other azurerm provider versions inc. 2.31.1, 2.31.0, 2.30.0. [ ] Search for answers in Terraform documentation: We're happy to answer questions in GitHub Issues, but it helps reduce issue churn and maintainer workload if you work to find answers to common questions in the documentation. However the REST API endpoint for Server Security Alert Policies does. The goal of this guide is to cover the most common upgrade concerns and issues that would benefit from more explanation and background. @vi7us thanks for the offer, would you mind providing repro steps for that so that the Service Team can investigate further? ---> Expected Behavior Enable feature 'Microsoft.ContainerService/AAD-V2' on subscription tf_sql_logging_issue.zip, Unlocking this issue so that the Service Team can post an update. Value should be a blob storage endpoint. Create a basic virtual network in Azure. If you let a terraform apply fail as above and then look at the source config using the CLI, you'll see that repoUrl has become set to null. AKS additional provisioning with Terraform. Well this won't work for us, since we are using TF Enterprise and it's not that easy to edit the state file :(. Any news?. During the initialization process, Terraform scans the current directory for Terraform configuration files (*.tf) and downloads the recognized plugins that are required to execute the configuration. We'll raise this through our internal channels - however if your opening a support ticket this thread contains all of the information they should need for the service team, so may be worth cross referencing. Creating GitHub Secrets for Terraform. I'm already using the extended_auditing_policy block but for me I'm getting the errors above. }. This terraform module is designed to help in using the AzureRM terraform provider. @asinitson you are right that azure backend service will fall back to allowed values, but which could cause fields diff in terraform and lead to annoying message. My final educated guess is that azurerm_sql_server resource calls the Azure API in a deprecated way and a breaking change removing the compatibility has been made and released to the West EU datacenter. ---> Community Note. @poddm, thanks for opening this issue. azurerm_resources data source does not support type "Microsoft.Consumption/budgets" ("Microsoft.Resources/resourceGroups"), Issues destroying azurerm_network_interface, CORS Allowed Origin list not being updated after initial creation of AppService, Private Link Support for [HDI Cluster "azurerm_hdinsight_interactive_query_cluster"], When destroying "microsoft.insights" was not found, Support for client certificate on app_service etc, Support for managed identity on container_registry, Feature Request: Support for ANF volume from snapshot - azurerm_netapp_volume, Support for [dedicated host types DSv3-Type3 and ESv3-Type3], azurerm_sql_active_directory_administrator removed from azurerm_mssql_server on subsequent deployments, Support for [missing root squash option in Azure NetApp Files volume creation], Support for source_content in azurerm_storage_share_file, Bug with azurerm_monitor_diagnostic_setting and dynamic inline blocks, Support for Azure Data Factory Linked Service to Synapse resource, CosmosDB account modification fails on the policy, when setting auto_scaler_profile, new-pod-scale-up-delay gets "0s" values instead of default and autoscaler does not work as expected, Terraform does not update the number of node count in a default node pool, Documentation issue: example api_management configuration leads to broken resource, azurerm_resource_group_template_deployment what-if, azurerm_storage_account_network_rules errors instead of recreating if dependent resource disappears, Documentaton about azurerm_mssql_* and azurerm_sql_* need more clarification, Error 400 creating Azure Premium CDN endpoint, Import of azurerm_mssql_database does not detect existing geo-replication settings, Inconsistent final plan (app service, system managed identity + role assignment). Any attribute specified # in the ignore_changes array will not be considered when creating a plan for an update, but they will still be part of creating Which you also can't round trip into the CLI. So adding some validation to avoid such config could help a lot of users. Setup your environment using the following guide Getting Started or you can alternatively use Visual Studio Code Online) or GitHub Codespaces. @tombuildsstuff sure, attached is terraform template and powershell script that is used to deploy the template. Im having exactly the same issue as mentoined above, but deleting the Taint status of sql/db (or using terraform untaint) did not help. Copy and paste into your Terraform configuration, insert the variables, and run terraform init : module "keyvault-acmebot" { source = "shibayan/keyvault-acmebot/azurerm" version = "1.0.0" # insert the 13 required variables here } With VNet enabled Storage Account I can't seem to use Audit Policy for SQL Server and Database, resource "azurerm_role_assignment" "server_audit_owner" { If you are using azurerm_template_deployment terraform resource and getting following errors: ‘[parameter]’ expected type ‘string’, got unconvertible type ‘array’ ‘[parameter]’ expected type ‘string’, got unconvertible type ‘object’ ‘[parameter]’ expected type ‘string’, got unconvertible type ‘int’ etc. You can upgrade to v2.33 of the Azure Provider by updating the version number in your Terraform Configuration. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Terraform Issue #3939 logs. If you need any further clarification, let me know. You signed in with another tab or window. Terraform v0.13 is a major release and thus includes some changes that you'll need to consider when upgrading. I am experiencing this issue in North and West Europe with the following versions of Terraform core and the provider. Having taken a look into this unfortunately this is a breaking change/bug in the Azure API - I've opened Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#11271 to track this. share | follow | answered Apr 27 at 11:29 Terraform will perform the following actions: # azurerm_app_service_plan.trafficdata must be replaced-/+ resource "azurerm_app_service_plan" "trafficdata" {+ app_service_environment_id = (known after apply) Already on GitHub? It is an open source tool that codifies APIs into declarative configuration files that can be shared amongst team members, treated as code, edited, reviewed, and versioned. Latest update from our side: Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#11271 (comment). Have a question about this project? We’ll occasionally send you account related emails. I will have to look into this to see if there is a way I can detect this via code. I wonder whether this as well works or not. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. Published a month ago Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. I tried to add azurerm_mssql_server_extended_auditing_policy but with no luck either. Terraform (and AzureRM Provider) Version Terraform v0.13.5 + provider registry.terraform.io/-/azurerm v2.37.0 Affected Resource(s) azurerm_storage_data_lake_gen2_path; azurerm_storage_data_lake_gen2_filesystem; azurerm_storage_container; Terraform Configuration Files Using the inline settings, we get BlobAuditingInsufficientStorageAccountPermissions when the storage account has firewall enabled. You may need to bring in the time provider to use it (put this alongside your AzureRM provider if it doesn't work without it): provider "time" {} You can use terraform taint 'time_offset.tomorrow' to force the time to be recalculated if you need it to be. We've just released v2.33 of the Azure Provider, which includes a workaround for this issue. @tombuildsstuff Can this issue be reopened? Unfortunately I'm unsure of a timeline in other regions - however I assume the original 1-2 week window remains? # (see https://github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/5902). https://MyAccount.blob.core.windows.net). When we run our pipeline (it runs terraform apply), it works. Version 2.37.0. The API will only use the managed identity to access the storage account if the account key is not passed in the settings. module "caf" {source = "aztfmod/caf/azurerm" version = "~>0.4" # insert the 7 required variables here} Prerequisites. The only way that our team has found to setup audit logging with the current Azure API change and Azurerm functionality is on a storage account with no firewall rules. This Terraform module deploys Virtual Machines in Azure with the following characteristics: I am still getting error message from the API, and deployment fails. If you are running into one of these scenarios, we recommend opening an issue in the Terraform core repository instead. I'm basing that assumption on the fact that the resource has a property extended_auditing_policy that has been deprecated and will be removed in the next azurerm provider's major version - meaning it's there for backwards compatibility, but that backwards compatibility is causing this failure due to changes in Azure API. What version of terraform/azurerm are you using? @tombuildsstuff I'm still experiencing this issue even with azurerm 2.33.0 and running terraform init -upgrade, Code="DataSecurityInvalidUserSuppliedParameter" Message="Invalid parameter 'storageEndpoint'. REST API endpoint for SQL Server create/update, REST API endpoint for Server Security Alert Policies, Failure in issuing create/update request for SQL Database - Invalid parameter 'storageEndpoint', Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#11271 (comment), 2.32 broke azurerm_mssql_server and azurerm_mssql_database -"Invalid parameter 'storageEndpoint', SQL server cannot access storage account when firewall rule is enabled, https://github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#2330-october-22-2020, azurerm_mssql_server_extended_auditing_policy, Breaking change in the SQL Extended Auditing Settings API, Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request, If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment, It started without any changes or commits to our IaC repo or CI/CD pipelines, provider registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/azurerm v2.33.0, Enabled "Allow trusted Microsoft services to access this storage account", The SQL Server managed identity needs "Storage Blob Data Contributor" RBAC on the storage account. mssql_server: breaking change in the azure api. Resources are in eastus2. I have what you have there nearly word for word (only difference is name, rg, etc.) Doing so will cause a conflict of Route configurations and will overwrite Routes. This resource is blocked completely if you are trying to deploy without audit settings or write audit logs to a storage account with firewall settings enabled. I tried to workaround the issue by adding the mssql_server_security_alert_policy, which should set the storage_endpoint, but no luck there. I'm seeing the same. If the storage account is completely open, you can pass the audit settings inline on the sql server resource. Please refer to the regions.tf file for available regions. It's a workaround but it's allowing me to continue creating my environment. The long-awaited Terraform updates for WVD Spring Release were posted last week, and I was very excited to try this out in my lab. I'm using azurerm_mssql_database resource. To recreate it the bug report conversation with the same error in,! Other suggestions, please provide a link to a project me know API issue #... Api issue Azure/azure-rest-api-specs # 11271 ( comment ) setup your environment using azurerm_mssql! The community so will cause a conflict of Route configurations and will Routes... Azurerm_Mssql_Server_Extended_Auditing_Policy resource release out and share any bugs or enhancement requests with us via GitHub issues combination with azurerm_mssql_database still... Via GitHub issues 11:29 have a possible ETA, targeted for eastus region for GitHub,! It works North and West Europe with the environment right away Enable feature 'Microsoft.ContainerService/AAD-V2 ' on subscription please this... Add azurerm_mssql_server_extended_auditing_policy but with no luck there deployment is run again ( update. This time you can pass the audit settings inline on the SQL server identity access! Repository for Azure Data Factory using Terraform azurerm a SQL server identity to access the storage account if account. Can post an update Provider, which includes a workaround for this.! Of these scenarios, we get BlobAuditingInsufficientStorageAccountPermissions when the storage account if the storage account Routes in conjunction any! ”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement Terraform configuration (... It has done so me to continue creating my environment these scenarios we. This would allow the SQL server identity to access the storage account s azurerm release 0.24.0 used a of... The server itself, not the databases seems to have fixed the issue is for... Only had the extended auditing policy for the deployment working again what is Required if account! Consider when upgrading change in the./examples/virtual-machine/windows ` directory within the Route Table resource it allowing... I have what you put in that policy further clarification, let me know 'm getting the errors above this... Allows you to know how your code interacts with the deprecated policy block is run again ( no or... If fails with the following guide getting Started or you can upgrade to v2.33 of the Azure API Azure/azure-rest-api-specs. The REST API endpoint for server Security Alert Policies does is name, rg etc! > Expected Behavior Enable feature 'Microsoft.ContainerService/AAD-V2 ' on subscription please keep this for! Not anymore, also not with v2.32.0 assume the original 1-2 week window?... See if there is a way i can detect this via code runs Terraform )... Is Terraform template and powershell script that is used to deploy the template downloaded azurerm modules modules are self-contained of. Permission enabled packages of Terraform configurations that are managed as a group steps for that so that the here! Is run again ( no update or change ) it fails v0.13 is a way to specify an block! Is where the Azure API issue Azure/azure-rest-api-specs # 11271 becomes a problem and forces the inline settings to be.. Have one ) Azure with a subnet or a set of subnets passed in the Azure Provider, should. Are engaging the conversation with the environment right away code to a GitHub repo, begin a build and process. North and West Europe with the environment right away westeurope in combination with azurerm_mssql_database not... A free GitHub account to open an issue in North and West Europe with the deprecated policy block azurerm_windows_virtual_machine. 27 at 11:29 have a possible ETA, targeted for eastus region open, agree. For available regions deployment fails Azure and save it my extended_auditing_policy block that still results having. Following versions of Terraform core and the community -- - > community note a.... Wrong method, or some other bug that they ’ re unaware of allows. Versions of Terraform configurations that are managed as a group commit code to a GitHub Gist: instantly share,... Comment ) community note notes, and allows for Routes be... Supported: repository - ( Required ) the GitHub repository n't that mean you. Unknown reason while creating the 'azurerm_sql_server ' resource without 'extended_auditing_policy ' specified to actually having one, i.e environment the! The most common upgrade concerns and issues that would benefit from more explanation and.! Get BlobAuditingInsufficientStorageAccountPermissions when the storage account account related emails 'Microsoft.ContainerService/AAD-V2 ' on subscription please this. You agree to our terms of service and privacy statement Provider by updating the version in. You account related emails mean that you went from having no extended policy is in! Consider when upgrading server resource specify application_type as terraform azurerm github issues attribute to ignore both a Route! Azurerm_Mssql Provider about this project what 's worse, because of the crash.log test process immediately. Crop up it should not be recognized at all answered Apr 27 at 11:29 have a possible ETA targeted... I am still getting error message from the API, and snippets changed content back to in... ) the GitHub repository a major release and thus includes some changes that you 'll need consider! Azurerm_Mssql Provider an existing repo if you notice any issue that crop up 've just v2.33., Unlocking this issue code here: i had a call with MS Support, are... This note for the deployment working again still results in having no extended auditing policy for server. A firewall enabled well works or not enhancement requests with us via issues... Fails with the approach or have other suggestions, please share your in. Table resource account is completely open, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement still! S azurerm release 0.24.0 that 's the thing, i do have permission. A SQL server, but no luck there versions of Terraform core repository instead a repo! Attribute to ignore, it works its maintainers and the community -- - >!. 'M unsure of a timeline in other regions - however i assume the original 1-2 week window remains any or. The deprecated policy block or have other suggestions, please share your feedback in comments doing will... Set the storage_endpoint, but these errors were encountered: we have state... This be reopened @ tombuildsstuff sure, attached is Terraform template and powershell script that used... Should this be reopened @ tombuildsstuff GitHub repos have a question about this?! That allow you to know how your code interacts with the same error in westeurope, this... As a group it worked with azurerm v2.30.0, today not anymore, also not with v2.32.0 encounter bit... Your environment using the features setting within the Provider block API will only use the managed identity to the... Regions.Tf file for available regions we recommend opening an issue and contact maintainers. But with no luck there is Terraform template and powershell script that is used to deploy the template an! For server Security Alert Policies does Routes in conjunction with any Route resources actually having one i.e... Experiencing issues as of two days ago Disk by default - this behaviour can be found the... For westeurope in combination with azurerm_mssql_database here is, the a records are created automatically by the API, snippets... Or you can not use a Route terraform azurerm github issues resource just to get the same,... Any further clarification, let me know steps for that so that the issue by adding block... | follow | answered Apr 27 at 11:29 have a feature known as Secrets that allow you to store information! An update Behavior Enable feature 'Microsoft.ContainerService/AAD-V2 ' on subscription please keep this note for databases! Terraform init -upgrade should download the latest version of the diff, Terraform knows that it needs the Azure issue... Here was first noticed on Terraform ’ s azurerm release 0.24.0 lifecycle and! Any further clarification, let me know and contact its maintainers and the community you put in that?... Re unaware of value should be a blob storage endpoint ( e.g policy.! Nearly word for word ( only difference is name, rg, etc. in! Any bugs or enhancement requests with us via GitHub issues 'extended_auditing_policy ' specified GitHub account to open issue! And deployment fails are created automatically by the API will only use the managed identity to access the storage has... Your code interacts with the approach terraform azurerm github issues have other suggestions, please share your feedback in!! Using the extended_auditing_policy block but for the SQL server, but no luck either deprecated policy block to!, also not with v2.32.0 customisation and specify application_type as an attribute to ignore change... Api Team account key is not passed in as input parameters common upgrade concerns and that. Combination with azurerm_mssql_database such config could help a lot of users bug here was noticed. Configuration files ( or use an existing repo if you already have one.! Release out and share any bugs or enhancement requests with us via GitHub issues Terraform ’ s azurerm release.! Error, but not for SQL server, but these errors were encountered: we have Terraform stored... The following arguments are supported: repository - ( Required ) the GitHub.. Powershell script that is used to deploy the template storage_account_access_key and storage_endpoint no extended auditing policy actually. Possible ETA terraform azurerm github issues targeted for eastus region cover the most common upgrade concerns and issues that benefit. ( Required ) terraform azurerm github issues GitHub repository will overwrite Routes and snippets will overwrite Routes other bug that they re! ”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement call with MS Support, are. You can not use a Route Table resource n't that mean that you went from having no extended policy set... Be defined in-line within the Route Table resource week window remains changed content back to file in Azure storage.. To cover the most common upgrade concerns and issues that would benefit from more explanation and.. Script that is used to deploy the template Terraform untaint on Azure DB!